Legal Opinion

Pawlowski v. Pierce

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1988No. B024233PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPENCER, P. J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Jack Pawlowski appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus and upholding the suspension of his driver’s license by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).

Statement of Facts

On February 9, 1986, Officer David Johnson of the Whittier Police Department testified he stopped plaintiff after observing him driving with his vehicle straddling the center divider and stopping with his vehicle partially in the intersection. His observations of plaintiff and plaintiff’s performance on field sobriety tests led him to the opinion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McDonnell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Lofthouse v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Buttimer v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Shackelton v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bronco Wine Co. v. Frank A. Logoluso FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Ellis v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Dyson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Zapata v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API