Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1993No. B065489PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Mark Fitzpatrick appeals from the denial of his petition to set aside an order by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) suspending his driving privilege for one year for failure to submit to or complete a chemical test of his breath, urine or blood to determine his blood-alcohol level. (Veh. Code, §§ 23157, 13353.) We find Fitzgerald was improperly denied the opportunity to confront and cross-examine the police officer who accused him of failing to take the tests. Therefore, we reverse and remand the matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

Facts and Proceedings…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Daniels v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Skinner v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Snelgrove v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Burkhart v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parris v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Beale v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  3. Lopez v. Shiomoto CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Pekin v. Valverde CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API