Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 2, 1990No. 674-89CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge,

This case is before the court on the Government’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant contends that the plaintiffs’ exclusive method for resolving overtime pay disputes under the Fair Labor Standards Act is the grievance procedure of their union’s collective bargaining agreement. The issue is whether, in the circumstances of this case, the relevant collective bargaining agreements exclude from their purview overtime pay disputes. After considering the parties’ written and oral arguments, the court concludes that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Eugene T. Harris v. The United States of America and the United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Office of Personnel Management National Treasury Employees Union v. Constance Horner, Director, Office of Personnel Management. National Federation of Federal Employees v. Constance Horner, Director, Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. Amos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Aamodt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  4. Beall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  5. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API