Legal Opinion
King v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 23, 2014No. 12-175PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; Fair Labor Standards Act; Learned Professional Exemption; Teacher Exemption; United States Customs and Border Protection; Course Developer/Instructor
OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). 1 The plaintiffs, current and former employees of United States Customs and Border Protection (“CBP” or “the agency”), brought this suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Akpeneye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Abou-El-Seoud v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- City of Wilmington, Delaware v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- MCLAUGHLIN v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025