Legal Opinion

Aamodt v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 5, 1991No. 623-89CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This action involves overtime pay claims brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1988). Plaintiffs are past or present GS-1811 special agents with the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”). On January 18, 1991, this court considered its jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiffs' claims in light of the holding in Carter v. Gibbs, 909 F.2d 1452, 1458 (Fed.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 46, 112 L.Ed.2d 22 (1990).1 The court divided the plaintiffs’ claims into three categories: 1) plaintiffs presently in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Karahalios v. National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1263Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aamodt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Armitage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Sample v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. Brammer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Armitage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API