Legal Opinion
Amos v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 21, 1991No. 666-81CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdic*725tion. Defendant contends that under the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA), 5 U.S.C. § 7101, et seq., plaintiffs’ exclusive method for resolving Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a), compensation claims is through the grievance procedures in their collective bargaining agreements (agreements). Plaintiffs concur with defendant that this court does not have jurisdiction over post-September 14, 1981 claims, covered by agreements executed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Skillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- David K. Schafer v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- James A. Albright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.