Legal Opinion
Eugene T. Harris v. The United States of America and the United States Department of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 10, 1988No. 87-1107PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by Eugene T. Harris (Harris or appellant) from a decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, CV185-163, holding that the trial court had no Tucker Act jurisdiction to determine Harris' environmental differential pay (EDP). The Civil Service Reform Act, as adopted in part in the collective bargaining agreement to which Harris was bound, provided the exclusive applicable grievance procedures necessary to determine Harris’ EDP, if any, and that of all other members of his bargaining unit. We agree with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company, an Illinois Insurance Company v. American National Insurance Company, a Texas Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- K. Kay Shearin v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Todd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Del-Rio Drilling Programs Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Todd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.