Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1949No. Civ. 17010PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent court from proceeding with a retrial of an action entitled “Nathan Posner v. Russel K. Chapman, et al.,” No. 853969, in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles, in which a motion for new trial had been granted upon plaintiff’s motion after a judgment had been rendered in favor of defendants. Petitioners also seek a writ of certiorari. An alternative writ of prohibition was issued by this court.

Judgment was rendered for the defendants, petitioners here, in Posner v. Chapman on June 4, 1948. June 9, 1948,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. United Railroads v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Secreto v. CarlanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Taber v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Garoutte v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hale v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Jordan v. WarnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. Fremont Meadows, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People ex rel. Department of Public Works v. RichmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API