Legal Opinion

Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1966No. Docket Nos. 22233, 22321PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

The proceedings reviewed herein arise out of a stockholders’ derivative suit brought by the plaintiffs, stockholders of the defendant Jacuzzi Bros., Incorporated, on behalf of that corporation against five individuals, 1 named as directors and employees of the corporation who with their families control the majority of the shares of the corporation, and against Jacbros, S.A., Geneva, a Swiss corporation. It is alleged that the defendant Candido Jacuzzi, as general manager and director of the corporation, dominated and controlled the other defendants. The first cause of action seeks rescission…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. In Re Oracle Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
  4. Don v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Conway v. Bughouse, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API