Legal Opinion

Hale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1974No. Civ. 13033PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*686Opinion

WHYTE, J.*

Plaintiff Arthur L. Hale brought suit against his insurance company Farmers Insurance Exchange, its attorney-in-fact, Farmers Underwriters Association (hereafter Farmers), their Orange County claims supervisor, defendant Eugene J. Penasa, and their claims examiner, defendant Sally Lawrence, for bad faith refusal to pay medical benefits due plaintiff under his automobile insurance policy.

A jury verdict was returned October 27, 1972, in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants in the total sum of $212,659.03. Judgment on the verdict was entered and included the following…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Norcal Mutual Insurance Company v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API