Taber v. Bailey
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The following facts disclosed by the evidence are sufficient for an understanding of the main points of controversy: Appellant, having obtained a bond for the purchase of certain mining property located in Nevada County and belonging to a corporation known as the Central Gold and Silver Mining Company, and desiring to purchase or having already purchased three thousand two hundred and fifty shares of the stock of that company and wishing to develop the mine and to sell it at a profit and needing money, he came to San Francisco and obtained a loan for two thousand dollars on his note with I.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Carlson v. LindauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- McCray v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Clippinger v. BreartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.