Garoutte v. Haley
California Supreme Court
Application in the Supreme Court for writ of mandate against the county clerk of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A conditional order on motion for a new trial is a valid exercise of judicial power. (Davis v. Southern Pacific Go., 98 Cal. 17.) The imposition of costs is a proper condition.
Read the full summary
Application in the Supreme Court for writ of mandate against the county clerk of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A conditional order on motion for a new trial is a valid exercise of judicial power. (Davis v. Southern Pacific Go., 98 Cal. 17.) The imposition of costs is a proper condition. (Rice v. Gashirie, 13 Cal. 53.) The second order superseded the first, and if there was any ground upon which the second order could have been made it must be presumed that such ground existed. (Paige v. Roeding, 96 Cal. 391; Colton etc. Go. v.…
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Application for a writ of mandate.
In an action brought by the petitioner against Stephen Williamson et al. in the superior court for the city and county of San Francisco judgment was entered January 31, 1894, in favor of the petitioner for the sum of three thousand eight hundred and ninety-one dollars, and twenty-one cents, and three hundred and sixty-six dollars costs of suit. A motion for a new trial was made by the defendants, and, after argument thereon, an order was entered in the minutes of the court July 31, 1894, granting said motion. August 13, 1894, the court made and caused to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Paige v. RoedingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Rice v. GashirieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Cockrill v. ClymaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Halpern v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Spivey v. District Court of Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.