Legal Opinion

White v. City of Alameda

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1899No. S. F. No. 1391PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court c£ Alameda County. W. E. Greene, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action for services as driver of a street wagon. The complaint alleges that one M. M. White (plaintiff’s assignor) was employed by defendant on April 19, 1897, <fto drive the street wagon and to take care of the horses of defend*96ant, at a salary of sixty dollars per month”; that this employment was by virtue of a resolution of the trustees of defendant passed on said day “appointing and employing” said White “driver of the street wagon, and to take care of the horses of defendant, at a salary to be paid said White therefor by defendant of sixty dollars per month.” It is alleged that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Madden v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Stone v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People ex rel. Hinton v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Matson Terminals, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Flickenger v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Curtin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Pacific Finance Corp. v. City of LynwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API