Jersey City Printing Co. v. Cassidy
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion, on older to show cause, for an injunction to restrain defendants, former employes of the complainant, and now on strike, from unlawful interference with the complainant’s business, the employment of workmen, &c. Heard on bill, answer and affidavits.
Read the full summary
On motion, on older to show cause, for an injunction to restrain defendants, former employes of the complainant, and now on strike, from unlawful interference with the complainant’s business, the employment of workmen, &c. Heard on bill, answer and affidavits. Hpon filing the bill an order was made restraining the defendants “from in any manner knowingly and intentionally causing or attempting to cause by threats, offers of money, payment of money, offering to pay 'or the payment of transportation expenses, inducements or persuasions to any employe of the complainant under contract to render…
1Opinion of the Court
Stevenson, Y. C.
(orally).
The bill is filed to restrain a body of workmen, who are on a strike, and other persons associated with them, from doing certain things which are alleged to be injurious to the complainant, their former employer. The things that they are restrained from doing are specified in the restraining order. That order was not made hastily. It was formulated with care on the part of the court, and I do not understand that counsel for the defendant criticises its terms on the ground that they are too broad. The defence is that the persons who are enjoined have not been doing,…
2Cited by31 opinions
- Myers & Myers, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Harris v. PerlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Matson Terminals, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Gray v. Building Trades CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Lohse Patent Door Co. v. FuelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.