Legal Opinion
General Motors Corporation v. Mulquin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 29, 1947PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The legal questions submitted by this reservation arise from the following facts found by a panel of three unemployment commissioners sitting on the plaintiff’s appeal from the examiner’s decision.
The New Departure Division of General Motors Corporation consists of two industrial plants in Connecticut, one at Bristol and the other, about eighteen miles away, at Meriden. Speaking generally, the Division—for so it will be called—is engaged in the production of ball bearings of various sizes. The bearings are antifriction devices consisting of steel balls, cones, cups and separators. All of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Chrysler Corp. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Matson Terminals, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Park v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Smedley Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.