North County Contractor's Ass'n v. Touchstone Insurance Services
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
The courts try to provide a semblance of certainty in an otherwise uncertain world. Perhaps that is why judges are reputed to feel uncomfortable about making educated guesses. Such discomfort is unwarranted when a judge must decide whether a settlement is made in good faith. In such cases judges are required to make educated guesses.
Here we hold that the trial Judge did not abuse his discretion when he granted a motion for good faith settlement. The settling defendants had limited assets, and it was questionable whether they had insurance coverage. The Judge therefore made…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Norco Delivery Service, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Hackett v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Cabrera v. Western Ag & Turf, Inc. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.