Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & Associates
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
This case requires us to consider the meaning of the phrase “settlement . . . made in good faith” as used in Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6,1 and to determine whether a plaintiff’s decision to dismiss a claim barred by the statute of limitations in return for a waiver of costs is sufficient to insulate the dismissed tortfeasor/defendant against claims in equitable indemnity asserted by a nonsettling codefendant.
I
Tech-Bilt, Inc. (Tech-Bilt) appeals from a judgment which granted a motion for summary judgment and dismissed its cross-complaint against Woodward-Clyde &…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by260 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Isaacson v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.