Legal Opinion

Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & Associates

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1985No. L.A. 31826PublishedCited by 260 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

This case requires us to consider the meaning of the phrase “settlement . . . made in good faith” as used in Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6,1 and to determine whether a plaintiff’s decision to dismiss a claim barred by the statute of limitations in return for a waiver of costs is sufficient to insulate the dismissed tortfeasor/defendant against claims in equitable indemnity asserted by a nonsettling codefendant.

I

Tech-Bilt, Inc. (Tech-Bilt) appeals from a judgment which granted a motion for summary judgment and dismissed its cross-complaint against Woodward-Clyde &…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by260 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Isaacson v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API