Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Norco Delivery Service, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1998No. G016225PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

Following a settlement between Owens-Cornins Fiberglas. Inc., and Seaward Properties, Ltd., the plaintiff in the underlying action, the trial court made a good faith determination and barred all cross-complaints against Owens-Corning. including that of Norco Delivery Service. Inc., under Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6. Norco challenges that good faith determination and also asserts the court, in addition to erroneously dismissing Norco's indemnity and contribution claims, improperly barred its independent, direct claims against Owens-Corning. We affirm.

I

Norco leased…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City of Grand Terrace v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Trollope v. JeffriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. GACKSTETTER v. FrawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. William L. Lyon & Associates, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Andreini & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Ellis v. Ellis CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API