In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
The Opinion and Order in these cases dated July 22, 2008 is hereby vacated and replaced with this Amended Opinion and Order.
I. INTRODUCTION
Twelve large gasoline refiners and their related corporate entities, who together account for approximately seventy percent of the named defendants in these cases, have agreed to pay plaintiffs in fifty-nine actions approximately $422 million to settle claims arising from contamination of public and private well water with the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”). 1 In addition,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Babb v. City of ChampaignIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Jersey Dep't of Envtl. Prot. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Watco Companies, Inc. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016