Legal Opinion

Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1990No. S000888PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

In this case we must decide whether a tort defendant that has entered into a good faith settlement with the plaintiff remains liable to other defendants for an indemnity claim that rests on a theory of “implied contractual indemnity.” A brief overview of the relevant legal background may help to place this complex issue in perspective.

When a tort action involves multiple defendants, there is often an inherent tension between the state’s interest in encouraging the voluntary settlement of litigation and the state’s interest in promoting a fair apportionment of liability among…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Galt G/S v. JSS ScandinaviaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API