Legal Opinion

Hackett v. John Crane, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 2002No. A092213, A093411PublishedCited by 10 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARGULIES, J.

A jury awarded plaintiffs Mark Lewis and his wife, Shirley Hackett, $2.3 million in damages arising from Lewis’s shipyard exposure to asbestos products manufactured by John Crane, Inc. (Crane). 1 Crane seeks reversal of the judgment, contending that it resulted from jury misconduct, prejudicial errors in the admission of evidence, and an improper special verdict form. In the alternative, Crane contends that the trial court miscalculated the amount of the offset it was entitled to for plaintiffs’ preverdict settlements and improperly awarded expert witness fees to Ms.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. MacHongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Torres v. Xomox Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Wilson v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Greathouse v. Amcord, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Jones v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Garcia v. DURO DYNE CORPORATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Deocampo v. AhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Marteney v. Elementis Chems. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API