Legal Opinion
Nurriddin v. Goldin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 17, 2005No. CIV.A. 99-3401JDBPublishedCited by 137 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ahmad Nurriddin, proceeding pro se, brings this employment discrimination action against Daniel Goldin, in his official capacity as administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”), pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging discrimination based on race, sex and religion, retaliation, and hostile work environment. Presently before tlm Court are defendant’s motion to amend and defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- Ahmad Nurriddin v. Charles BoldenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Nurriddin v. BoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Na'im v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.