Read v. Corbitt Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the action, or, in lieu thereof, to quash the return of service of the summons.
Plaintiff, a resident of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, brought this action against defendant, a Delaware corporation, having its principal office and place of business at Henderson, North Carolina, for breach of contract. The return of service by the United States Marshal reads as follows: “I hereby certify and return, that on the 7th day of June, A.D. 1949, I received the within summons and served the same at Phila., Pa., in my district, on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kenny v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Allentown Record Co. v. Agrashell, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- W. H. Elliott & Sons Co. v. E. & F. King & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1956
- Convery v. Clairol, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Solt v. Interstate Folding Box Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954