Legal Opinion
Convery v. Clairol, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 19, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 16594PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are residents of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; defendant is a Connecticut corporation with its principal office in New York, New York. Defendant is not registered with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a foreign corporation authorized to transact business in Pennsylvania. This suit is for breach of warranty involving a product manufactured and marketed by defendant and applied by a beauty shop in Philadelphia, in the bleaching of plaintiff Grace Convery’s, hair which resulted in certain alleged injuries to said plaintiff. The matter is now…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Myers Motors, Inc. v. Kaiser-Frazer Sales Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
- Allentown Record Co. v. Agrashell, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Botwinick v. Credit Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Miller v. Kiamesha-Concord, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Rensing v. Turner Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
- Kenny v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Giuliano v. Alitalia Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963