Legal Opinion
Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 25, 1943No. 8009PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.
The special appeal is from a judgment quashing the service of process upon the defendant, appellee here, a Kentucky corporation.
Plaintiffs’ suit for damages was founded on defendant’s alleged false representations inducing them to use its product “Brixment” in constructing their residence in Washington. Brixment was represented as a waterproofed mortar or cement used in masonry work. Process was served by delivery to defendant’s employee, C. E. Lovewell, within the District of Columbia. Appearing specially, defendant moved to quash the service on the ground it was…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lone Star Package Car Co., Inc. v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.