Legal Opinion

State v. High

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1971No. 25PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

The record contains no exceptions and no assignments of error. The only question for review, therefore, is whether error appears on the face of the record proper. “When the case on appeal contains no assignments of error, the judgment must be sustained, unless error appears on the face of the record.” State v. Higgs, 270 N.C. 111, 153 S.E. 2d 781 (1967); State v. Newell, 268 N.C. 300, 150 S.E. 2d 405 (1966); State v. Williams, 268 N.C. 295, 150 S.E. 2d 447 (1966); State v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E. 2d 800 (1966).

An examination of the record proper reveals no error. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DarnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. HiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. NewellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. DozierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API