State v. Williams
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
No assignments of error appear in the record or briefs filed in this Court as required by Rule 19(3), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. “Therefore, unless error appears on the face of the record proper, or the issues are insufficient to support the judgment entered, the judgment will be sustained.” Trust Co. v. Henry, 267 N.C. 253, 148 S.E. 2d 7. See Bank v. Bryant, 257 N.C. 42, 125 S.E. 2d 291; Milling Co. v. Laws, 242 N.C. 505, 87 S.E. 2d 925; Smith v. Smith, 242 N.C. 646, 89 S.E. 2d 255; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 218 N.C. 468, 11 S.E. 2d 311.
We have examined the record proper, and find
No error.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hobbs v. . HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Hobbs v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Arcady Farms Milling Co. v. LawsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.