Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1966No. 260PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

No assignments of error appear in the record or briefs filed in this Court as required by Rule 19(3), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. “Therefore, unless error appears on the face of the record proper, or the issues are insufficient to support the judgment entered, the judgment will be sustained.” Trust Co. v. Henry, 267 N.C. 253, 148 S.E. 2d 7. See Bank v. Bryant, 257 N.C. 42, 125 S.E. 2d 291; Milling Co. v. Laws, 242 N.C. 505, 87 S.E. 2d 925; Smith v. Smith, 242 N.C. 646, 89 S.E. 2d 255; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 218 N.C. 468, 11 S.E. 2d 311.

We have examined the record proper, and find

No error.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. . HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Hobbs v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Arcady Farms Milling Co. v. LawsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. HiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API