Legal Opinion

State v. Dozier

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1971No. 73PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The capable and experienced counsel who represented the defendant in the trial and now represents him on this appeal argues the convictions of his client should be reversed on three grounds: (1) the State failed to establish the county or venue in which the alleged offenses took place; (2) the trial court committed error in overruling the defendant’s pleas in abatement and motions to quash the indictments upon these grounds, (a) the trial jury in capital cases is given absolute, uncontrolled and standardless discretion to decide between death and life imprisonment, (b) the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. PuryearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. LouchheimCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. HighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API