Legal Opinion

State v. Darnell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1966No. 85PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cubiam.

“The right of appeal is unlimited in the courts of North Carolina. . . .” State v. Beasley, 226 N.C. 577, 579, 39 S.E. 2d 605, 606; G.S. 15-180; State v. Grundler and State v. Jelly, 251 N.C. 177, 111 S.E. 2d 1. This case is a fair example of the manner in which that unlimited right is now being perverted at the whim of those who have nothing to lose. An indigent defendant has only to say, “I appeal,” and the county is required to furnish him with counsel, “transcript and records required for an adequate and effective appellate review.” G.S. 15-4.1.

This record contains no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. State v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. TempletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. TinsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API