Legal Opinion

State v. Newell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1966No. 270PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant having pleaded guilty, his appeal presents for review only whether error appears on the face of the record proper. S. v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E. 2d 800. Suffice to say, the record proper does not show error.

The record on appeal, prepared by defendant’s court-appointed counsel, contains one assignment of error, namely, that “(t)he Court erred in pronouncing an excessive, cruel and unreasonable punishment.” The sentences are well within the limits prescribed by G.S. 14-119 and G.S. 14-120. Hence, they cannot be considered cruel and unusual in a constitutional sense. S. v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. DarnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API