Legal Opinion
Zielinski v. Ryan Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 17, 1985No. C3-85-951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a determination by the Commissioner of Economic Security that relator refused a suitable offer of reemployment without good cause, and was therefore not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
Relator, Dennis Zielinski, was employed as a construction worker by the Ryan Company in May 1984. He worked an average of 33 to 34 hours per week. In December, Zielinski was laid off but was called back on December 24 until December 28, when he was told there would be no more work immediately available. His employer suggested that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Grushus v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hansen v. Continental Can CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Thompson v. SchraiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Blau v. Masters Restaurant Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Engler v. Marshall Turkey PlantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Hackenmiller v. Ye Olde Butcher ShoppeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- John Matheson, Relator v. Progressive Action - Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Mohamed Yusuf, Relator v. Masterson Personnel, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016