Hansen v. Continental Can Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Certiorari to review a decision of the commissioner of manpower services. The report of the commissioner found the relator ineligible for unemployment benefits because he was not “available for work” within the meaning of Minn. St. 1971, § 268.08, subd. 1(3). We reverse.
The essence of this appeal is whether § 268.08, subd. 1(3), was properly interpreted and correctly applied to the facts. Minn. St. 1971, § 268.08, subd. 1(3), provides:
“An individual shall be eligible to receive benefits with respect to any week of unemployment only if the commissioner finds that:
* * * # *
“(3) He was able to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Olson v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Thompson v. SchraiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
3Cited by17 opinions
- Semanko v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Shreve v. Department of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Davenport v. STATE, DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENTIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Kleinwachter v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Goodman v. Minnesota Dept. of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.