Legal Opinion
Grushus v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 8, 1960No. 37,803PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This case comes to us on certiorari from the Department of Employment Security for review of its determination that Harold Grushus should receive unemployment compensation under the Employment Security Act, M. S. A. c. 268, and that benefits thereunder should be charged to the experience rating account of the employer, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company.
The claimant was employed by that company for a period of approximately 7 years. On January 3, 1958, he was laid off for lack of work. Thereafter he applied for and received unemployment compensation. On August 19, 1958,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Thomas v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Swanson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Smith v. American Indian Chemical Dependency Diversion ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Sondra Irving v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Peterson v. HauleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Winkler v. Park Refuse Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.