Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1984No. 6027-PRPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

The defendant, Joe U. Smith, was convicted and judged guilty of burglary, A.R.S. § 13-1507, sexual assault, A.R.S. § 13-1406, and aggravated assault, A.R.S. §§ 13-1203 and 13-1204. He was sentenced to a term of fifteen years for the burglary to run consecutively with concurrent sentences of three years for the aggravated assault and twenty-one years for the sexual assault. The Court of Appeals affirmed in a memorandum decision. We granted the defendant’s petition for review, taking jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. Art. 6, § 5(3) and Rule 31.19, Arizona Rules of Criminal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. PeartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. State v. SchrockArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. ANJWashington Supreme Court · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API