Legal Opinion

In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fioramonti

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1993No. SB-92-0040-D. Disciplinary Commission No. 89-1327PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is a State Bar disciplinary proceeding. At the committee level, two members recommended disbarment and one recommended a four-year suspension. At the commission level, five members recommended a three-year suspension and four recommended disbarment. Both sides ap*183peal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. 46(a).

FACTS

I. Facts Leading to Christine’s Complaint

John Anthony Fioramonti (respondent) has been a member of the State Bar since 1976. He has no prior disciplinary record. On November 4, 1985, he met with a client,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, FresquezArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Matter of WolframArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re AlcornArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re SchollArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Matter of HorwitzArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re VarbelArizona Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API