Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 7, 2008No. 59722-1-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

186 P.3d 1179 (2008)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Michael Eugene PETERSON, Appellant.

No. 59722-1-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

July 7, 2008.

Casey Grannis, Nielsen Broman & Koch, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Michael Eugene Peterson, pro se.

Seth Aaron Fine, Attorney at Law, Snohomish Co. Pros. Office, Everett, WA, for Respondent.

APPELWICK, J.

¶ 1 Michael Peterson is required to register as a sex offender under RCW 9A.44.130. He had registered, but moved from the registered address and did not re-register for more than 30 days. The statute requires re-registration within 48…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. DurrettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API