Legal Opinion

State v. Hickman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1998No. 65141-8PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

954 P.2d 900 (1998)

135 Wash.2d 97

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

James D. HICKMAN, Petitioner.

No. 65141-8.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 28, 1997.

Decided April 30, 1998.

Nielsen & Broman, Eric Nielsen, David Koch, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Jim Krider, Snohomish County Prosecutor, Constance Crawley, Deputy County Prosecutor, Everett, for Respondent.

SANDERS, Justice.

We review a Court of Appeals decision affirming petitioner's conviction for insurance fraud. The issue is whether venue of the crime becomes an element for the State to prove under the "law of the case" doctrine…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. WitherspoonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. SchelinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API