Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2010No. 82089-9PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

230 P.3d 588 (2010)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Michael Eugene PETERSON, Petitioner.

No. 82089-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 21, 2010.

Decided May 6, 2010.

Casey Grannis, Nielsen Broman & Koch, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Seth Aaron Fine, Snohomish County Prosecutor's Office, Everett, WA, for Respondent.

STEPHENS, J.

¶ 1 Presented as a challenge to the sufficiency of the State's evidence, this case requires us to consider what elements constitute the crime of failure to register as a sex offender (failure to register) under former RCW 9A.44.130 (LAWS OF 2003,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. Rojas-MarcelenoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. OwensWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. HaberleinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. UltrerasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API