State v. Bennett
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 Residential status is not an element of the crime of failure to register as a sex offender. Here, the trial court properly instructed the jury that to convict, it must find that the defendant knowingly failed to comply with the sex offender registration requirements. Accordingly, we affirm.
*204FACTS
¶2 In 1991, Clarence Bennett Jr. (Bennett) was convicted of a sex offense and was notified that he was required to register with the sheriff as a sex offender. In December 2006, he registered his address as that of his father, Clarence Bennett Sr. (Clarence Sr.). In December 2007, he was still…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Michael Jay StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington, V. Donnica Denise BookerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022