Legal Opinion

State v. Hickman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1998No. 65141-8PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

We review a Court of Appeals decision affirming petitioner’s conviction for insurance fraud. The issue is whether venue of the crime becomes an element for the State to prove under the “law of the case” doctrine when it is given to the jury without objection in the “to convict” instruction, and if so, whether the State proved venue here.

We conclude elements in the “to convict” instruction not objected to become the “law of the case” which the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to prevail. By acquiescing to jury instructions which included venue as a necessary element to convict, even…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. WitherspoonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. SchelinWashington Supreme Court · 2002

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API