Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Fall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1900No. Nos. 11,984—(31)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant and Alvord C. Egleston, surety on bis bond on appeal from a judgment of a justice of tbe peace, from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county in favor of plaintiff and against defendant and said surety, entered pursuant to the order of Pond, J.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This action originated in justice court, which found that the defendant had actually injured the plaintiff’s property in the sum of $25, and that such injury was wilful, and therefore the plaintiff was entitled to treble damages. Accordingly judgment for $75 damages and costs was entered against the defendant, in all $82.15. Thereupon the defendant attempted to appeal to the district court of the county of Hennepin, and complied with all the statutory requirements necessary to effect a valid appeal, except that the affidavit of appeal, which purported to have been sworn to before a notary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colman v. GoodnowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. DeGraw v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Norton v. HaugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Stolt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Thompson v. ScheidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. LoughrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. In Re Estate of MikkelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. O'LOUGHLIN v. OtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Hartkopf v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Hodge v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API