Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Mikkelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1929No. 27,397PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing an appeal from the probate court because of defects in the notice of appeal. Its caption laid the venue of the proceeding in the probate court for the county, of Blue Earth instead of the county of Faribault, where it was actually pending. It was directed properly to the administrator of the estate and to his attorneys and gave notice that the appellants were appealing “from the decree of the above named probate court [in the caption indicated to be the probate court of Blue Earth county] * * * which said decree assigned the estate of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burns v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Dunham, Buckley & Co. v. Randall & Chambers Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Stolt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Graham v. ConradSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Grimes v. FallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trowell v. Diamond Supply Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Czaplinski v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Trowell v. Diamond Supply Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Arizona Corp. Commission v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Strom v. LindstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API