Holmes v. Loughren
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Cant, J.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of the county of St. Louis in favor of the defendants in an action to determine adverse claims to real estate.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner in fee of lot 12, block 11, West Duluth, First division, according to the plat thereof, which is vacant and unoccupied, that the defendant claims some title to or interest therein, which is without- any right or foundation, and prays that the court adjudge that the plaintiff is the owner in fee of the lot and that the defendant has no title to or interest in it. The answer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barber v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Godfrey v. ValentineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- St. Paul Division No. 1 v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Smith v. KippSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Sanborn v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jasperson Ex Rel. Drew v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Denny v. StevensWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Schoonmaker v. St. Paul Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Willard v. HodappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Babcock v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.