Norton v. Hauge
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Freeborn county, Farmer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $196.72 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
Action in trespass for taking personal property. Defendants justify the taking under a writ, of attachment issued by, a justice of the peace in an action wherein the defendants Hauge, Christopherson, and Haugen, partners as Hauge, Christopherson & Co., were plaintiffs, and this plaintiff and one Stanton were defendants, and executed by the defendant Trow, then a constable, by taking the property, August 1890. On August 11th that action was dismissed, another in behalf of the defendant Haugen against the same defendants was commenced before the same justice, another writ of attachment issued,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bloomingdale v. ChittendenMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Jackson ex dem. Kenyon v. VirgilNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Bates v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Hathaway v. ScottNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re BellahDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1902
- First National Bank v. Clifton Armory Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1912
- Turner v. St. JohnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Lutz v. KinneyNevada Supreme Court · 1896
- Grimes v. FallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.