Legal Opinion

O'LOUGHLIN v. Otis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1979No. 49634PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant filed an election contest in Hennepin County District Court alleging violations of Minn.St. 210A.04, subd. 1. The district court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the contest for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant appealed from this order claiming that there is jurisdiction, because she substantially complied with the requirements of Minn.St. c. 209, and that the district court erred in hearing the motion, because it was not filed within the time required by Rule 6.04, Rules of Civil Procedure. Respondent challenges appellant’s right to bring this appeal, because she has not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Franson v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Odegard v. LemireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Holmen v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Anderson v. LappegaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Grimes v. FallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stransky v. Independent School District 761Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. In Re AHST Community School District Public Measure "B" ElectionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  3. Rachner v. GroweCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Kearin v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. In Re Ahst Community School District Public Measure "B" Election, ContestantsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API