Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Scheid

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action in replevin to recover a span of horses. Both parties claim through one Geibenhain; the defendant under a mortgage executed to Glynn & Robinson, July 8,1886, and filed the next day; the plaintiff under a mortgage executed August 11, 1886, and filed the same day. The property remained in the possession of Geibenhain, the mortgagor, until December 18, 1886, when it was sold under the first mortgage, and purchased at the sale by one Jonas, who afterwards sold and delivered it to defendant. Both mortgages were executed in good faith and for a valuable consideration. When plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colman v. GoodnowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Stevens v. McMillinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. DeGraw v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Ferguson v. HoganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  5. German-American Bank v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. New England Furniture & Carpet Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. McDaniel v. HoblitWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Adamson v. SundbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Holmes v. LoughrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API