Legal Opinion

People v. Franklin

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1999No. S068112PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

State law imposes an annual registration requirement on certain sex offenders while they reside or are located in California. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (a)(1)(A), (C).)1 Offenders subject to registration must also notify authorities of any change of their address. (§ 290, subd. (f)(1).) A 1998 amendment to section 290, adding subdivision (f)(1), specifically requires offenders to give change-of-address notification on leaving California. (Stats. 1998, ch. 930, § 1.1.)

Defendant in the present case failed to notify the California authorities with whom he had initially registered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. People v. CastenadaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. CastellanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API