Legal Opinion

People v. Castenada

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2000No. S069237PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

For the fourth time in roughly as many years, we construe Penal Code section 186.22, a provision of the California Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act of 1988, also known as the STEP Act. The three previous decisions, People v. Zermeno (1999) 21 Cal.4th 927 [89 Cal.Rptr.2d 863, 986 P.2d 196], People v. Loeun (1997) 17 Cal.4th 1 [69 Cal.Rptr.2d 776, 947 P.2d 1313], and People v. Gardeley (1996) 14 Cal.4th 605 [59 Cal.Rptr.2d 356, 927 P.2d 713], involved an interpretation by this court of certain phrases in subdivision (b)(1) of section 186.22, which increases the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. People v. AlbillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. PruntyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. People v. SengpadychithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API