People v. Castellanos
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
Following defendant Luis Castellanos’s conviction of a series of criminal offenses, the trial court ordered him to register as a sex offender pursuant to a provision in Penal Code section 290 that became effective after defendant committed those offenses. The Court of Appeal struck the trial court’s order, concluding that requiring defendant to register as a sex offender violates the ex post facto clauses of the federal and California Constitutions (U.S. Const., art. I, § 10; Cal. Const., art. I, § 9). We disagree. As explained below, the trial court’s order is valid…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Johnson v. Department of JusticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. PicklesimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.