Legal Opinion

State v. Hines

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1978No. 771SC768PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant has raised three primary issues in his brief: (1) Is it necessary that the bill of indictment specifically allege that the victim was in fact deceived? (2) Can there be a conviction under G.S. 14-100 when some compensation is given for the services obtained by false pretenses? (3) Can the defendant be convicted of a violation of G.S. 14-100 when adequate compensation is in fact given but the compensation actually paid is less than the compensation promised?

First, defendant strongly urges that the failure of the bill of indictment to charge that Miss Etheridge was in…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. . PhiferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  5. State v. . HowleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Lane v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. State v. CagleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. CroninCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API